Chapter 4, Mishna 4

Are the Shavuot loaves consecrated by the slaughter of the ram or by the sprinkling of its blood?
Do the loaves transfer their sanctity to the money if they are redeemed?
If the blood of the Shavuot sheep is sprinkled for the wrong purpose, can the loaves still be eaten?
What makes the Shavuot loaves consecrated and allowed to be eaten?
If the Shavuot sheep become piggul, do the loaves also become piggul?
Does sprinkling the blood still take effect if the loaves already left the Temple courtyard?
If the loaves left the courtyard, can the blood sprinkling still allow them to be eaten?
And what if the loaves left the courtyard and were brought back before the blood was sprinkled?
Does sprinkling with piggul intent change the laws of misuse of consecrated property?
Can a sacrifice be invalid when done for its own sake?
And, can it be valid when done for not for its own sake?
If the loaves of a thanksgiving become invalid, can the animal still be offered as a peace offering?
Is a thanks offering still valid if its loaves are lost?
If four loaves were brought instead of two, which loaves become sanctified?
How can the extra loaves be redeemed if the slaughter already made them fully sanctified?
Where should the extra loaves be redeemed, inside or outside the Temple courtyard?

❤️ Support our work and dedicate an episode of AT Daily to the healing/honor/memory of a loved one.
🤗 Sign up for our free weekly newsletter!