Chapter 7, Mishna 2
Is the bird sin offering that is performed below the red line the one case that follows a different law?
If a bird burnt offering is done below the red line like a sin offering, is it still treated as a burnt offering for the law of misuse of consecrated property?
Why does meila (misuse of consecrated property) get applied differently when a bird burnt offering is redesignated as a sin offering compared to the reversed redesignation?
Does the rule that applies when a guilt offering is sacrificed as a peace offering apply when a bird burnt offering has both its purpose and its location changed to that of a sin offering?
What happens when two birds designated for different offerings become mixed up?
How does this play out in the context of a woman who has given birth (which creates an obligation to bring bird offerings of both types, burnt and sin) who also vowed to bring additional offerings of the baby was a male, and then the became mixed up, first by her, and then by the priest?
Opening song: Moshe Storch leads Hallel at Beis Medrash Hancock Park
β€οΈ Support our work and dedicate an episode of AT Daily to the healing/honor/memory of a loved one.
π€ Sign up for our free weekly newsletter!